The two aviation giants, Bombardier and Gulfstream, come with their own set of strengths and weaknesses. In general, Gulfstream Jets are considered to be cheaper, and more reliable.
The planes are usually used for private aviation and business travel. Bombardier jets, on the other hand, is more expensive but has a better interior design. It is mainly used for business travel and also for international flights like their competitor the Cessna Citation I.
The Global 7500 vs Gulfstream G700 comparison is a little tough thing to do as each aircraft has its own fans, so we will try to make it simple so you can decide.
Gulfstream G700 vs Global 7500
Quick Devlopment History
The development of Gulfstream G700 and Bombardier Global 7500 began with the release of the respective studies held between 2009 and 2010. Although Global 7500 was released first, G700 was the second one to be produced and launched. It was released just a few months after the Gulfstream.
The first plane of both companies was released in early 2019, The Gulfstream G700 hasn’t been produced yet as it will enter the service in 2022, while the Bombardier Global 7500 has been entered the service and produced a total of 47 units. Both companies have released a few more planes of their respective models in the coming years. However, the majority of the planes have been produced by Bombardier.
Size, Range, Price, Fuel Capacity and Efficiency
Comparing the size of the two planes, the Global 7500 is slightly larger than the G700. However, the difference is not that significant.
The Global 7500 has a wingspan of 31.7 meters, which is 0.3 a meter longer than the wingspan of the G700. The fuselage length of the G700 is 33.48 meters, which is 0.4 of a meter shorter than the fuselage length of the Global 7500.
The weight of the Global 7500 is 870 tonnes, which is 20 tonnes heavier than the weight of the G700. The G700 is a fuel-efficient business jet, as it can fly a distance of 13,890 km without refueling.
On the other hand, the Global 7500 can fly up to 14,260 km and still make it to its destination. This shows that the Global 7500 is slightly more fuel-efficient than the G700. However, as long as you fly for a short distance, i.e. within your own country, the G700 is just as efficient.
Both of the aircraft can accommodate up to 19 passengers. Both these planes have a fuel capacity of 22,000 Kg, which is more than enough to fly across the Atlantic.
The equipped price of the G700 is 78M million USD, while the equipped price of the Global 7500 is 75 million USD. Both these planes are amongst the most expensive in the industry.
The two planes are quite similar when it comes to interior design. However, there are some key differences. The Global 7500 has a wider seating arrangement, which makes it feel more spacious. It also features a fully flat floor which makes it easy for passengers to move around the plane.
The seats on the G700 are slightly more comfortable than the ones on the Global 7500, but they are not as spacious as those on the plane. The Global 7500 also has a wider baggage compartment, as well as a larger cargo hold. The Global 7500 also has an on-board entertainment system, which the G700 does not have. This allows passengers to watch movies, listen to music, and have access to the Internet on board the plane.
The G700 has a separate galley for the flight attendants, which is not present in the Global 7500. This makes it easier for the flight attendants to serve the passengers on the plane.
The cabin of the G700 is designed in a traditional style. It features a total of 19 seats which are arranged in a 2-2 configuration. The seats are made up of leather, with a few having individual recline buttons. Each seat comes with a personal entertainment screen, as well as a personal reading light.
The cabin of the Global 7500 is designed to be more sophisticated than the G700. The seats have a more modern design. They are made up of leather and have individual recline buttons. Each seat comes with a personal entertainment screen, as well as a personal reading light. It is also fitted with a fully flat floor, giving passengers a more comfortable seating experience.
Specifications, Speed, Takeoff & Landing Performance
The engines of the G700 and the Global 7500 are quite similar. The engines used in the Global 7500 are General Electric Passport. The G700 has twin Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 turbofan engines.
Both these engines have a maximum thrust of 18,000 pounds and can fly at a maximum speed of Mach 0.85. The maximum takeoff weight MTOW of the G700 is 48,807 kg, while that of the Global 7500 is 47,536 kg. The G700 has a better maximum takeoff weight, as it is a larger plane. However, the Global 7500 has a better fuel capacity, which allows it to fly for longer distances.
The Global 7500 can fly for a longer distance than the G700 because it has a larger fuel capacity. The G700 needs a longer runway to take off than the Global 7500. The G700 needs a runway that is at least 6,250 ft long, in order to take off. The Global 7500 can take off from runways that are as short as 5,880 ft.
The G700 has a longer runway requirement, as it is a larger plane. The service ceiling of the G700 is 51,000 ft, while that of the Global 7500 is 43,000 ft. This makes the G700 better at flying at high altitudes. The service ceiling is the maximum altitude that a plane can fly. The higher the service ceiling, the higher the plane can fly.
Conclusion: Gulfstream g700 vs Global 7500 which is better?
Gulfstream G700 and Global 7500 are both very good aircraft. The Global 7500 is cheaper but has much more space than the Gulfstream G700.
If you are looking for a comfortable aircraft, then the Global 7500 is for you. The Gulfstream is much better for people who are traveling in groups because this plane is larger than the G700. For those who prefer to travel alone, then the G700 is for you.
The Global 7500 has a much more formal design, while the Gulfstream is a little more relaxed and more casual. They are both great planes that are worth the money. Both are very comfortable to fly in and have excellent engines.